Monday, February 14, 2005
WSJ.com - In Climate Debate, The 'Hockey Stick' Leads to a Face-Off
Statistics lie or are unreliable in exactitude?
Using tree rings is the foundation on which to build analysis of past temperatures? What is the margin of error?
Correlating that data with other data has already introduced uncertianty.
I'm going to say that global warming is bunk and only serves the basic human need to believe in something. Most believe in a diety. The Left believes in global warming.
This is my Copernican moment! (I do see the irony that the previously held belief is the one that goes agianst CW.)
Statistics lie or are unreliable in exactitude?
Using tree rings is the foundation on which to build analysis of past temperatures? What is the margin of error?
Correlating that data with other data has already introduced uncertianty.
I'm going to say that global warming is bunk and only serves the basic human need to believe in something. Most believe in a diety. The Left believes in global warming.
This is my Copernican moment! (I do see the irony that the previously held belief is the one that goes agianst CW.)
Comments:
Post a Comment
